Uhuru’s lawyers defend IEBC’s decision not to hold fresh nominations

Written By: Micheal Njuguna

Supreme Court
Nomination are necessary for a general election and in the event the office of president becomes vacant ~ Fred Ngatia.

President Uhuru Kenyatta’s lawyers have defended the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission’s decision not to hold fresh nomination in the October 26 repeat presidential poll.

KBC Radio_KICD Timetable

The president legal team led by Fred Ngatia argued that the fresh presidential election did not need nominations.

Also Read  President Kenyatta commissions construction of hospitals in informal settlements

Ngatia told the Supreme Court Thursday that the nominations dispute cannot be a basis for cancelling President Kenyatta’s win.

The lawyer said the process is only necessary during a general election and in the event the office of president becomes vacant.

Get breaking news on your Mobile as-it-happens. SMS ‘NEWS’ to 20153

Ngatia further submitted that NASA’s withdrawal from the fresh presidential election was an abandonment of electoral process.

Also Read  Ministry to overhaul KNBTS management to streamline operations

The president lawyers have therefore asked the Supreme Court judges to dismiss the two cases filed by activists Njonjo Mue and Khelef Khalifa and the other by former Kilome MP Harun Mwau.

Also Read  Judiciary and Gender parity: NGEC raises red flag

More to follow…



Tell Us What You Think